🌱GMODebate.org 优生学调查

Investigations

🦋 GMODebate.org investigates the philosophical roots of eugenics and traces it to scientism and the centuries older emancipation of science movement.

This website contains various investigations of corruption regarding the enforcement of GMO.

Stop Ecocide International

A conversation with Stop Ecocide International resulted in an article about the GMO based eradication of the 🦟 mosquito species, in an attempt to provide an example case for why it is important to address the subject in ecocide law.

Eugenics and the Essence of Inbreeding

Our investigation of the philosophical roots of eugenics reveals that eugenics resides on the essence of inbreeding.

Simple logic reveals the correlation at first sight. A philosopher on the discussion forum of Philosophy Now magazine captured the essence of eugenics as following:

blond hair and blue eyes for everyone

utopia

Our notion goes beyond a mere increasingly limited and vulnerable gene pool due to loss of genetic diversity and touches on the deeper reason that inbreeding causes adverse effects in the first place which requires a fundamental different perspective than the status quo scientific understanding of inbreeding.

Cows in the US have been driven to near extinction from a genetic perspective due to the logical consequences of eugenics. While there are 9 million diary cows in the US, from a genetic perspective there are just 50 cows alive.

The founder of 🦋 GMODebate.org has investigated the roots of eugenics and scientism since as early as 2006 through the critical blog 🦋Zielenknijper.com.

The Dutch blog was founded in cooperation with Dutch philosophy professor Wim J. van der Steen who was an intellectual opponent of psychiatry and the idea that the mind originates in the brain.

The blog contains an investigation of political corruption surrounding the legislation of euthanasia in psychiatry. In 2010 Dutch psychiatrists enforced the right to euthanize their patients by releasing their patients to commit suicide on the streets, which looked like a political extortion tactic.

Our article about eugenics reveals that medical psychiatry and eugenics were founded simultaneously and were based on the same core philosophical ideas. The article reveals that the mechanism perspective of mind logically results in eugenic ideologies.

French philosopher Michel Foucault:

[Medical] psychiatry was a bridge between the clinical gaze and the evolutionary narrative—a bridge built from bricks of mechanism, waiting for Darwin's cement of purpose.

German philosopher Max Horkheimer:

Science's emancipation from philosophy birthed a new barbarism—one that worships efficiency and discards the human.

Scientism

Our investigation of eugenics traces it to scientism and reveals that it is an escape attempt: a retreat from the fundamental uncertainty of nature into an illusory certain empirical realm.

🇷🇺 Russian trolls, aided by anti-GMO groups such as the 🍒 Center for Food Safety and Organic Consumers Association, have been strikingly successful in sowing doubt about science in the general population.

(2018) Anti-GMO activism sows doubt about science Source: Alliance for Science

Within this context, science attempts to create a situation of war against science in which opponents can be challenged and combatted on ideological rather than philosophical grounds.

Justin B. Biddle

The anti-science or war on science narrative has become popular among science journalists. While there is no question that some opponents of GMO are biased or ignorant of the relevant facts, the blanket tendency to characterize critics as anti-science or engaged in a war on science is both misguided and dangerous.

(2018) “Anti-science zealotry”? Values, Epistemic Risk, and the GMO Debate 来源: PhilPapers | justinbiddle.com (Georgia Institute of Technology)

Our investigation of the application of the anti-science narrative in 🇵🇭 Philippines reveals that the label is weaponized alongside calls for literal prosecution.

In 2021, the international science establishment called for anti-science to be combated as a security threat on par with terrorism and nuclear proliferation:

Antiscience has emerged as a dominant and highly lethal force, and one that threatens global security, as much as do terrorism and nuclear proliferation. We must mount a counteroffensive and build new infrastructure to combat antiscience, just as we have for these other more widely recognized and established threats.

(2021) The Antiscience Movement Is Escalating, Going Global and Killing Thousands 来源: Scientific American

The path of feeling threatened by doubt, seeking a context of war on science for ideological combat of opponents and subsequent calls for prosecution, represents a modern form of inquisition of heretics.

Daniel C. Dennett Charles Darwin 查尔斯·达尔文还是丹尼尔·丹尼特?

As part of our investigation of scientism, 🦋 GMODebate.org published the philosophy discussion On the Absurd Hegemony of Science in which renowned philosophy professor Daniel C. Dennett (known for his best seller Darwin's Dangerous Idea) participated in defense of scientism.

For those interested in the views of Daniel C. Dennett, chapter Dennett's Defense of His Rejection of 🧠⃤ Qualia contains over 400 posts debating Dennett's rejection of the philosophical concept Qualia.

A book without an end… One of the most popular philosophy discussions in recent history.

📲 (2025) On the absurd hegemony of science 来源: 🦋 GMODebate.org | Download as PDF and ePub

Other Investigations

A pattern over the years has been the investigation of various cases of corruption, which are now published on ✈️ MH17Truth.org.

One of the latest investigations is Google's corruption for AI life forms or its digital species that are to replace the human species for an apparent wicked techno eugenics related idea.

Other investigations include:

🔭 CosmicPhilosophy.org

Our new 2025 project CosmicPhilosophy.org investigates the dogmatic nature of science and advocates that science should return to its original status Natural Philosophy.

Albert Einstein versus Philosophy On The Nature of 🕒 Time And Philosophy's Great Setback For Scientism The shift from natural philosophy to physics started with Galileo and Newton's mathematical theories in the 1600s, however, energy and mass conservation were considered separate laws that lacked philosophical grounding. This changed fundamentally with Einstein's famous equation E=mc², which unified energy conservation with mass conservation. This unification created a kind of epistemological bootstrap that enabled physics to achieve self-justification, escaping the need for philosophical grounding altogether. This historical investigation of the Einstein-Bergson (science versus philosophy) debate that would cause the great setback for philosophy in history reveals that French philosopher Henri Bergson lost the debate on purpose for the advancement of scientism. 来源: 🔭 CosmicPhilosophy.org

Other investigations include:

    简体中文cn🇨🇳繁體繁体中文hk🇭🇰dansk丹麦语dk🇩🇰Українська乌克兰语ua🇺🇦O'zbekcha乌兹别克语uz🇺🇿اردو乌尔都语pk🇵🇰Tagalog塔加洛语ph🇵🇭Русский俄语ru🇷🇺български保加利亚语bg🇧🇬සිංහල僧伽罗语lk🇱🇰Hrvatski克罗地亚语hr🇭🇷magyar匈牙利语hu🇭🇺हिंदी印地语hi🇮🇳Bahasa印尼语id🇮🇩Қазақша哈萨克语kz🇰🇿Türkçe土耳其语tr🇹🇷Српски塞尔维亚语rs🇷🇸বাংলা孟加拉语bd🇧🇩नेपाली尼泊尔语np🇳🇵עברית希伯来语il🇮🇱Ελληνικά希腊语gr🇬🇷Deutsch德语de🇩🇪Italiano意大利语it🇮🇹Latviešu拉脱维亚语lv🇱🇻Bokmål挪威语no🇳🇴čeština捷克语cz🇨🇿slovenčina斯洛伐克语sk🇸🇰slovenščina斯洛文尼亚语si🇸🇮ਪੰਜਾਬੀ旁遮普语pa🇮🇳日本語日语jp🇯🇵ქართული格鲁吉亚语ge🇬🇪français法语fr🇫🇷polski波兰语pl🇵🇱Bosanski波斯尼亚语ba🇧🇦فارسی波斯语ir🇮🇷తెలుగు泰卢固语te🇮🇳தமிழ்泰米尔语ta🇱🇰ไทย泰语th🇹🇭eesti爱沙尼亚语ee🇪🇪svenska瑞典语se🇸🇪беларуская白俄罗斯语by🇧🇾Lietuvių立陶宛语lt🇱🇹မြန်မာ缅甸语mm🇲🇲Română罗马尼亚语ro🇷🇴suomi芬兰语fi🇫🇮English英语us🇺🇸Nederlands荷兰语nl🇳🇱Português葡萄牙语pt🇵🇹Español西班牙语es🇪🇸Tiếng Việt越南语vn🇻🇳العربية阿拉伯语ar🇸🇦한국어韩语kr🇰🇷मराठी马拉地语mr🇮🇳Melayu马来语my🇲🇾